Changing dimensions of security in post-cold war period
An impactful outcome of the end of cold war on global security affairs is the world where military interventions were became the only threats to the security. There came the era where security affairs have to be thought in relation to environment, economy, culture and perhaps least in relation to military interventions. Changing dimensions of security in post-cold war period cab be discussed efficiently under the following broad topic heads:
®Rise
in conflicts related to separatism and ethnic nationalism.
®International
terrorism threating global peace.
®Change
in approaches to interstate competition since economic worries get the centre
stage.
®Rise
in threats to environment.
The post-cold war era
can be predominantly termed as modern era of civil wars. The established
peaceful lines separating a state from the other were and are being challenged.
Apart from more conflicts are of intra state nature than interstate. In the
middle east, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria,
Jordan, Israel, Palestine, Yemen, Pakistan etc. , in the Africa,
Somalia, Sudan, Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Mali, Niger, Congo etc. are few of the
states badly affected by advent of civil wars. In civil wars, there nothing
‘civil’ in that. Few of the deadliest weapons of modern era are being used
against so called enemy mainly ending us hurting innocent citizens. The highest
lose is of innocent civilians and their property. It seems the paradigm of
security is now changed to human centric than state centric especially after
cold war. Human security is prime is issue now.
Experiences of
religious and radical intolerance have been gradually developed as form of
terrorism. Radicalisation of religious beliefs is one of the gravest worries especially
after the end of cold war. Amalgamation
of drug and trafficking mafia grouping with radical religious fronts
with the blessings of selfish political outfits have created cross border
networks of important supplies threatening the security of the state. The havoc and charged atmosphere
created after every successful terror attacks do weaken the state’s credulity
and subsequently authority. This sort of atmosphere fuels the civil wars.
The most threatening
establishment that has got its profound presence is international terrorist
organisation. Majority of 35 odd terrorist organizations designated by the
United Nations have come into existence after the end of cold war. The
signature event showing the malicious and dangerous idea of these organizations
was 9/11 in the US. It showed how the mightiest military power in the world
could be shaken and faith of millions of peaceful people can be trembled. It is
considered as a turning point in global security regime. The London bombings,
attacks on embassy, Indian and Afghan parliaments and strong emergence of
radical terrorist organization Al Qaeda under the leadership of Osama Bin Laden
were few of the grave happenings that have defined the new state security
realities in early 2000s. Recent advent of emergence of the Islamic State of
Iraq and Levan (ISIL) is considered dangerous threat than the earlier to world
peace.
Non-military threats
to security are important aspects arose mainly after end of the cold war. There
are two main subjects of a state with which threats to state security are being
thought: 1. Matters related to economic stability and growth and 2. Matters
concerning environmental degradation. Financial stability of a country, foreign
flows, energy supplies are few of the most important sectors of economy that
are now target in new world order. Economic insecurities are pushing for
radical change in political regime as for example the Suhurto regime. It has
ignited revolutions too many a times.
States like Nauru, Fiji, Kiribati, Borabora and entire Caribbean are
under existential threats due to global environment degradation. The United
Nations has recognised this fact for small developing islands. These nations
are at the blink of submergence.
The post-cold war era
has seen qualitative change and shift in the perception about threats to
security. Non-military dimensions occupy considerable space in the imagination
of security policy makers. That is a sea change and significant too along with
worries for speedily rising civil wars and international terrorism.
Jazak Allah
ReplyDelete